.

Monday, March 18, 2019

Essay on Shirley Jacksons The Lottery - Blind Obedience Exposed

Blind Obedience Exposed in The Lottery The one-year ritualistic stoning of a villager in Shirley Jacksons The Lottery parallels customs duty in American culture. This paper provide inform the reader of the effect tradition has on characters in the little story The Lottery and how traditions button up strongly influence peoples lives in america. Christian weddings wet-nurse many traditions and superstitions that seemingly maintain logic. Although most couples no longer have arranged marriages or dowries, fathers still give their daughters away during the services. The bride and groom do not see all(prenominal) other before the ceremony, fearing that bad luck might come their way. A friend scolded me because I had originally planned to marry at the book binding of the hour, and told me I should change it only when to be safe. Society continues to hold these traditions and superstitions very dear because of cultural influences and the possibility of bad things happening. I n Shirley Jacksons short story The Lottery, the annual ritualistic stoning of a villager parallels the traditions natural in American culture. The black box is a source attribute of tradition for the townspeople. The original box wore out many years ago, and a new box was built from pieces of the old. This reflects customs in our own society. For exam... ... time. It is feasible that they were simply afraid of what would happen to them if they changed or stopped the lottery. Maybe they just went through the motions of the lottery without questioning why, or really giving it much thought. Whatever the real reason, the tradition of the lottery continued. I leave besides continue to uphold traditions at my wedding one-month from now when my father will give me away at half past the hour, and I will take great pains not to see my fianc before. Work Cited Jackson, Shirley. The Lottery. publications Reading, Reacting, Writing. 4th Ed. Ed. Camille Adkins. Orlando Harcourt Col lege Publishers, 2001. 315-322

No comments:

Post a Comment