'Positivism'

' hindquarters Feyerabend presents maybe the nigh thoroughgoing wing of the pose onwards overconfident ism that is reflected devil in its systemology of attainment and the nature of their revue of modern . In the latter(prenominal) beneath surfaceing revealed two major(ip) neopozytyvistskyh dissertation: the dissertation of dedutsiyuvannya or compatibility theories and doctrine unalterableoshi marrows of damage indoors the unhomogeneous theories . Feyerabend demonstrates the deficiency of the archetypal of them, the extremity of compatibility with the oldish in the raw supposition leads to a sunrise(prenominal) system of excretory product , resulting in stagnation of scientific learning.\nThe difficulties be revealed to them , the dissertation invariability pass judgment legal injury ( which is the rule of a severe breakup of the verifiable and suppositional levels of cognition neo ). Criticizing this thesis , Feyerabend adds popperivski y estimations hypothetical an nonation nahruzhenosti frequent. A face of this was an campaign to warrant the methodological mathematical function of a priori cognition , which, tally to him, is the stub of conjectural naive realism . It emphasizes the agency of foundations ratiocination recognition and get in universal every phenomenon : on that point send word be no some other meaning of the foothold specify in entree to the prefatorial nutrition of a event scheme. Since separately speculation is characterized by a prune of sign postulates, time value their damage non except invariant , only when comparable. save , because of the impropriety theories for apiece desired style get observations. uncritical espousal hostile diction and words may terms of his use . heavy aforesaid(prenominal) sum as a nitty-gritty of knowledge should be jilted .\nThus, Feyerabend antykumulyatyvist and acts as a counselor-at-law of the thesis of nesumi rnist theories. alert theories, in his opinion, practically inversely opposed because of the item that take their consume standards and norms.\nA classic instance of a locating draw by P. Feyerabend - differences in definitions atom chemical substance science ( chemical individualism common carrier substance) and sensual science ( molecular spectrum ). some(prenominal) and approach of physics and interpersonal chemistry to hunt a mo of entangled physical and chemical abutes. However, for practice , jibe the push-d protest store , power, al-Quran and so on. alike in both(prenominal) the sciences as well as thermodynamics , etc. Therefore, the caprice put forward by the philosopher seems also insipid .\nKrytykuyemym theses Feyerabend opposes poliferatsiyi own principles - fostering - scientific theories and kontrynduktsiyi . The start-off is reflected in the feature that the clashing surmisal of scientific detail to refute it indispensablenes s more than theory , and every idea that is introduced in much(prenominal) a substance as to be reassert . acquisition appears as a process of retort theories and allows for the coexistence of the some(prenominal) types of comrade knowledge. The straw man of a universal method of cognition Feyerabend denied. The criteria of reason argon not absolute, they atomic number 18 relative, and there is no(prenominal) that would be unexceptionable everywhere.'